<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Olivier's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://odalet.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Dieu a inventé le chat pour que l’homme puisse caresser le tigre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving the state of a Graphics object by Bob52</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/saving-the-state-of-a-graphics-object/#comment-11746</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/saving-the-state-of-a-graphics-object/#comment-11746</guid>
		<description>I actually opted for two answers depending on whether the averaging is done on distance or time. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually opted for two answers depending on whether the averaging is done on distance or time. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving the state of a Graphics object by Coder16</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/saving-the-state-of-a-graphics-object/#comment-11745</link>
		<dc:creator>Coder16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/saving-the-state-of-a-graphics-object/#comment-11745</guid>
		<description>Avoid those miserable colds. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoid those miserable colds. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Log4Net: IP parsing bug when used with framework .NET 2.0 by The devva.net blog &#124; log4net UdpAppender on IPv6 (Windows 2008, Vista or 7)</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11741</link>
		<dc:creator>The devva.net blog &#124; log4net UdpAppender on IPv6 (Windows 2008, Vista or 7)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11741</guid>
		<description>[...] at least) and that is something that didn&#039;t make it into the log4net 1.2.10 release. There are some fixes to log4net, but the 1.2.10 version is compiled into loads of other framworks that I&#039;m using and compiling an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least) and that is something that didn&#39;t make it into the log4net 1.2.10 release. There are some fixes to log4net, but the 1.2.10 version is compiled into loads of other framworks that I&#39;m using and compiling an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Log4Net: IP parsing bug when used with framework .NET 2.0 by Using LogView4Net with EPiServer &#124; Fredrik Haglund's blog</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>Using LogView4Net with EPiServer &#124; Fredrik Haglund's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>[...] appears that there is are issues in net 2.0 with IPv6 interfering with the parsing of the remoteAddress but the bug fix appear not to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears that there is are issues in net 2.0 with IPv6 interfering with the parsing of the remoteAddress but the bug fix appear not to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Log4Net: IP parsing bug when used with framework .NET 2.0 by Olivier</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11595</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11595</guid>
		<description>Thank you SergeS!

Just after having read your comment I checked the log4net repository and jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112). And the source code has been modified in the same way that your proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SergeS!</p>
<p>Just after having read your comment I checked the log4net repository and jira (<a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112" rel="nofollow">https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112</a>). And the source code has been modified in the same way that your proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Log4Net: IP parsing bug when used with framework .NET 2.0 by SergeS</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11588</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/log4net-ip-parsing-bug-when-used-with-framework-net-20/#comment-11588</guid>
		<description>Problem is not with IPAddressConverter.

All you need is fix two lines in &#039;UdpAppender::InitializeClientConnection()&#039;, so that both &#039;new UdpClient()&#039; calls use &#039;RemoteEndPoint.AddressFamily&#039; parameter as well.

With this fix both IP4 and IP6 working OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is not with IPAddressConverter.</p>
<p>All you need is fix two lines in &#8216;UdpAppender::InitializeClientConnection()&#8217;, so that both &#8216;new UdpClient()&#8217; calls use &#8216;RemoteEndPoint.AddressFamily&#8217; parameter as well.</p>
<p>With this fix both IP4 and IP6 working OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pattern singleton thread safe en C# : c&#8217;est facile by Olivier</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/pattern-singleton-thread-safe-en-c-cest-facile/#comment-11395</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/pattern-singleton-thread-safe-en-c-cest-facile/#comment-11395</guid>
		<description>Eh Antoine, n&#039;en fais pas trop quand même !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh Antoine, n&#8217;en fais pas trop quand même !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pattern singleton thread safe en C# : c&#8217;est facile by Ant</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/pattern-singleton-thread-safe-en-c-cest-facile/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odalet.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/pattern-singleton-thread-safe-en-c-cest-facile/#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>Merci ça m&#039;a trop aidé dans un développement dans un contexte multithreadé, préemptif avec intropsection multiprotocole.

Par contre il faut lire la ligne :
public static Instance { get { return instance; } }

commme :

public static MySingleton
 Instance { get { return instance; } }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merci ça m&#8217;a trop aidé dans un développement dans un contexte multithreadé, préemptif avec intropsection multiprotocole.</p>
<p>Par contre il faut lire la ligne :<br />
public static Instance { get { return instance; } }</p>
<p>commme :</p>
<p>public static MySingleton<br />
 Instance { get { return instance; } }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &quot;using&quot; pattern by TibO</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/the-using-pattern/#comment-11389</link>
		<dc:creator>TibO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/the-using-pattern/#comment-11389</guid>
		<description>Oo lol, jte kif tro mdr ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oo lol, jte kif tro mdr ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &quot;using&quot; pattern by JF Totain</title>
		<link>http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/the-using-pattern/#comment-11388</link>
		<dc:creator>JF Totain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odalet.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/the-using-pattern/#comment-11388</guid>
		<description>LoL laché vo kom !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL laché vo kom !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
